Leveraging Pathogenesis to Treat Pruritus in the Elderly
Authors: Ajay Dulai, MBBS, MSc1 Daniel Butler, MD2


Key Points
- As we age, our skin undergoes various inflammatory processes which impact our skin through immunologic, neuropathic, and primary cutaneous pathways.
- In the elderly, these changes can cause pruritus without morphological changes, making diagnosis and treatment difficult.
- To target the multifaceted pathogenesis of pruritus in the elderly, medications should be synergistically used to modulate several pathways.
How does this work highlight an innovative perspective in dermatology?
The presentation of pruritus without morphological changes can be difficult to treat. With the advancements in advanced targeted therapies, clinicians should be informed on how to best leverage the mechanisms of actions of these drugs.
Within our aging population, there is a growing prevalence of dermatological concerns within the elderly. One of the primary concerns of geriatric dermatology is the presentation of pruritus, which becomes more common with advancing age.1 With approximately 40% of all dermatology clinic visits regarding a patient over the age of 65, the management of pruritus is highly relevant to all dermatologists.2
Pruritus in elderly patients often presents without visible morphological changes, making diagnosis and management more challenging. Fortunately, new advancements in understanding the pathophysiology of age-associated itch assist us in targeting the multifactorial etiology of itch. The process of aging, often referred to as “inflammaging,” occurs through three key mechanisms: immunologic, neuropathic, and primary cutaneous.
Immunologic changes are believed to occur via the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) of cells, which promotes the release of pro-inflammatory and tissue-remodelling factors.3,4 This contributes to a shift toward a Th2-dominant immune state in aging skin. In addition, skin barrier recovery slows with age, primarily due to reduced epidermal lipid synthesis, which occurs at only two-thirds the rate seen in younger individuals.5 The neuropathic component must also be considered, as aging is associated with autonomic dysfunction and a decline in neuroplasticity.6
Diagnosis of chronic itch in the elderly can be difficult due to the absence of rash and nonspecific presentation. History taking is key including duration, description of symptoms, intensity, ameliorating factors, and exacerbating factors.7 A careful review of medical history and medications are needed to identify triggers such as chronic kidney disease and drug abuse. To exclude infectious causes of itch such as scabies, it is important to ask if any close contacts and family have similar symptoms. A further complete physical exam, dermatologic exam, and skin biopsy are recommended to exclude other etiology of itch. Recommended laboratory tests in the context of the examination includes a complete blood count, metabolic profile, liver function tests, thyroid function tests, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.7
Effective treatment of pruritus in the elderly should address all three contributing domains. This can be achieved through therapies that act via shared mechanisms or by combining agents that target distinct pathways (see Table 1). For instance, to address both immunologic and neuropathic components, one might use a topical corticosteroid alongside pramoxine, or a JAK inhibitor in combination with doxepin.
As clinicians, we are entrusted to care for the elderly population, many of whom suffer from pruritus without visible skin changes. Understanding the multifactorial pathophysiology of aging helps us create an effective management plan. By approaching pruritus in the elderly through this lens, we can more effectively improve quality of life of these patients.
Table 1: Examples of medications which manage itch through the different mechanisms of aging: immunologic, neuropathic, and primary cutaneous
References:
1. Shive M, Linos E, Berger T, Wehner M, Chren MM. Itch as a patient-reported symptom in ambulatory care visits in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. Oct 2013;69(4):550-6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.029
2. Rui P HE, Okeyode T. national ambulatory medical care survey: 2016 state and national summary tables National Center for Health Statistics.
3. Csekes E, Rackova L. Skin Aging, Cellular Senescence and Natural Polyphenols. Int J Mol Sci. Nov 23 2021;22(23)doi:10.3390/ijms222312641
4. Franco AC, Aveleira C, Cavadas C. Skin senescence: mechanisms and impact on whole-body aging. Trends Mol Med. Feb 2022;28(2):97-109. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2021.12.003
5. Choi EH. Aging of the skin barrier. Clin Dermatol. Jul-Aug 2019;37(4):336-345. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.04.009
6. Chang YC, Lin WM, Hsieh ST. Effects of aging on human skin innervation. Neuroreport. Jan 19 2004;15(1):149-53. doi:10.1097/00001756-200401190-00029
7. Valdes-Rodriguez R, Stull C, Yosipovitch G. Chronic pruritus in the elderly: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Drugs Aging. 2015 Mar;32(3):201-15. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0246-0.
Affiliations:
1. Integrative Skin Science and Research, Sacramento, CA
2. University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ
Conflicts of Interest:
Dr. Daniel Butler has served as an advisor for Sanofi, Galderma, Leo, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and has served as a speaker for Novartis, Sanofi, Leo. Investigator for Pizer, Abbvie, and Incyte.
Ajay Dulai reports no conflicts of interest.